Qubika vs LeewayHertz: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: August 2026
Quick verdict
Qubika (4.1/5) edges ahead of LeewayHertz (3.8/5) overall. Qubika is the better choice for uS buyers wanting a large Latin American delivery bench for agentic AI, managed through a US-based entity.. LeewayHertz is the stronger option for enterprises wanting autonomous multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Qubika vs LeewayHertz: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Qubika | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2006 | 2007 |
| HQ | Austin, TX, USA | Gurugram, India |
| Team size | 501–1,000 | 51–300 |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | US buyers wanting a large Latin American delivery bench for agentic AI, managed through a US-based entity. | Enterprises wanting autonomous multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Python, LangChain, AWS | Python, LangChain, LangGraph |
| Industries served | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS |
Qubika vs LeewayHertz: overview
Qubika
Qubika was formed from the merger of Moove It and December Labs, tracing its roots to 2006, and is headquartered in Austin, Texas with delivery centers throughout Latin America and roughly 879 employees. Its digital product and AI/cloud services practice has extended into agentic AI, giving clients access to a large Latin American engineering bench alongside a US legal and account-management entity. Its broader digital-product origins mean agentic-specific depth should be confirmed against more concentrated specialists if that is the top priority.
LeewayHertz
LeewayHertz is an AI development company founded in 2007, with LinkedIn listing its headquarters in Gurugram, Haryana, India and other sources noting a San Francisco corporate office; reported headcount ranges from roughly 180 to 300 employees. The firm was acquired by The Hackett Group on September 16, 2024, which now folds LeewayHertz's agentic AI capability into Hackett's broader enterprise consulting business — a material ownership change buyers should factor into long-term vendor continuity planning. It focuses on multi-agent system design for complex, data-rich enterprise environments, including autonomous orchestration framework selection and integration with ERP and CRM systems.
Services and capabilities: Qubika vs LeewayHertz
| Capability | Qubika | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-agent orchestration | ✗ | ✓ |
| RAG / knowledge integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Workflow & systems integration | ✓ | ✓ |
| Coding agents | ✓ | ✗ |
| Monitoring & anomaly detection | ✗ | ✗ |
| Customer-facing agents | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Qubika vs LeewayHertz
| Framework / platform | Qubika | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| LangChain | ✓ | ✓ |
| LangGraph | N/A | ✓ |
| AutoGen | N/A | N/A |
| LlamaIndex | N/A | N/A |
| OpenAI | N/A | N/A |
| Anthropic Claude | N/A | N/A |
| Pinecone | N/A | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Qubika vs LeewayHertz
| Criterion | Qubika | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Qubika vs LeewayHertz
| Dimension | Qubika | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Mid-market to enterprise | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services | Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce |
| Best use cases | US companies wanting a large nearshore Latin American team for agentic AI development, Bundling agentic AI into a broader digital product engineering engagement | Multi-agent architecture design for data-rich enterprise environments, Agents requiring deep ERP or CRM integration (e.g. Salesforce, SAP) |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Qubika vs LeewayHertz: pros and cons
| Qubika | |
|---|---|
| + | US headquarters (Austin, TX) with a large, multi-country Latin American delivery bench |
| + | Nearly two decades of combined operating history (via Moove It and December Labs) since 2006 |
| + | ~879 employees gives meaningful capacity for larger agentic programs |
| + | Broader digital product engineering background helps agentic features ship inside real products |
| - | Agentic AI is one offering within a broad digital product and cloud portfolio, not a standalone specialty |
| - | Merger history (Moove It + December Labs) means account continuity is worth confirming directly |
| - | Minimum engagement figures are not published, requiring direct sales contact for early budgeting |
| LeewayHertz | |
|---|---|
| + | Nearly two decades of AI development history since 2007 |
| + | Deep experience with autonomous multi-agent orchestration framework selection for complex environments |
| + | Strong ERP/CRM integration experience for enterprise data-rich deployments |
| + | Post-acquisition access to The Hackett Group's broader enterprise consulting network |
| - | Acquired by The Hackett Group in September 2024 — a material ownership change that can affect team continuity |
| - | Reported headquarters and headcount vary noticeably across sources, worth confirming directly post-acquisition |
| - | Heavy content-marketing presence means its public profile can outpace independently verified differentiation versus peers of similar size |
Who should choose Qubika?
Qubika is the right choice for uS buyers wanting a large Latin American delivery bench for agentic AI, managed through a US-based entity..
A US headquarters paired with a large, multi-country Latin American delivery bench (~879 people) formed from two merged digital product firms.. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce, Financial Services.
Who should choose LeewayHertz?
LeewayHertz is the right choice for enterprises wanting autonomous multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach..
Deep multi-agent architecture and autonomous orchestration-framework selection experience, now combined with The Hackett Group's enterprise consulting network post-acquisition.. Minimum engagement starts at $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial Services, Manufacturing, Retail & E-commerce, Technology & SaaS.
Decision matrix: Qubika vs LeewayHertz
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Qubika |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Qubika |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Qubika (Not published) vs LeewayHertz ($25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | LeewayHertz |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Qubika vs LeewayHertz
| Use case | Qubika fit | LeewayHertz fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| US companies wanting a large nearshore Latin American team for agentic AI development | Strong | Limited | Qubika |
| Bundling agentic AI into a broader digital product engineering engagement | Strong | Limited | Qubika |
| Multi-agent architecture design for data-rich enterprise environments | Limited | Strong | LeewayHertz |
| Agents requiring deep ERP or CRM integration (e.g. Salesforce, SAP) | Limited | Strong | LeewayHertz |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Qubika vs LeewayHertz
Qubika (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Agentic AI Development projects. A US headquarters paired with a large, multi-country Latin American delivery bench (~879 people) formed from two merged digital product firms.. It is best for uS buyers wanting a large Latin American delivery bench for agentic AI, managed through a US-based entity..
LeewayHertz (3.8/5) is the better choice when enterprises wanting autonomous multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach.. If your situation matches those criteria, LeewayHertz is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Qubika vs LeewayHertz FAQ
Is Qubika better than LeewayHertz?
Qubika (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Qubika is better for uS buyers wanting a large Latin American delivery bench for agentic AI, managed through a US-based entity.. LeewayHertz is better for enterprises wanting autonomous multi-agent system design with deep ERP/CRM integration, now backed by Hackett Group's consulting reach..
How do Qubika and LeewayHertz differ in pricing?
Qubika uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. LeewayHertz uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Qubika or LeewayHertz?
Qubika is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Qubika and LeewayHertz?
Qubika's primary differentiator is: a us headquarters paired with a large, multi-country latin american delivery bench (~879 people) formed from two merged digital product firms.. LeewayHertz's primary differentiator is: deep multi-agent architecture and autonomous orchestration-framework selection experience, now combined with the hackett group's enterprise consulting network post-acquisition.. They also differ in team size (501–1,000 vs 51–300), minimum engagement (Not published vs $25K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Technology & SaaS, Retail & E-commerce vs Financial Services, Manufacturing).
Last reviewed: August 2026. Verify all details directly with each provider before making a decision.